„Zum Schutz des Kundenerlebnisses“

“To protect your customers’ experience.”

Süddeutsche Zeitung’s translation of part of the C.E.O. of Netflix’s carefully formulated blog post carefully indicating that Netflix now has to secretly pay off countless intermediaries in the U.S.A. between its streamed content and its paying customers. If Netflix has to do this, presumably the other content providers do too, including companies too small to afford it. Netflix’s customers are also paying off some of the same intermediaries—a very small number of them—in order to get internet access.

The squeeze on content-providing companies apparently includes use of the following loophole: U.S. internet providers are claiming network neutrality while selling content providers more-direct inputs into their pipeline. It appears from the S.Z. article that U.S. internet providers are saying everything leaves their boxes at the same speed; they merely receive some folks’ data more indirectly than other folks’ data. Pay them off and your content won’t bounce through as many service providers [Dienstleister] before it has been officially received.

The squeeze on internet content consumers: One third of all American consumers have only one internet provider to choose from, the Süddeutsche informed its readers, and another 37% have only two providers. In the technology Hochburg known as Seattle: perhaps 2.3. Earlier this year Seattle’s new mayor canceled the city’s plans to build municipal broadband, and my I.S.P. almost doubled my bill shortly afterward.

Apparently groups who are partially responsible for the inadequacy of broadband infrastructure construction in the U.S. can use this dearth to extract more money which they use to further impede broadband construction. And the agency nominally in charge, the F.C.C., seems to keep restricting its own ability to regulate.

(Tsoom   SHITZ   dess   CUNNED en eah LABE niss ess.)

Zwei-Klassen-Internet

“Two-class internet,” Deutsche Telekom’s third current scandal: they plan to charge content providers for not slowing down their content’s delivery, ultimately giving large, financially-established firms an advantage over smaller firms and startups.

By also “throttling” consumers’ internet access speeds, Telekom was planning to cash in at both ends of the pipe. Deutsche Telekom has now conceded to the outrage by announcing they won’t throttle consumers’ internet access as hard or as fast as originally announced.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal wrote on 19 Jun 2013 that large US content companies have already been paying tens of millions of dollars per year per company to large phone and cable internet companies in the USA to keep the network operators from slowing down delivery of their content. The same large content companies could be blackmailed by similar network controllers in every country in the world.

(Tsv eye CLOSS en Internet.)

Blog at WordPress.com.